🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.