🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, coercive phone calls recurred. At first, supposedly from a retired cop and a former defense officer, later from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan claims he was called to the local precinct and told clearly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

The leather artisan is one of many opposing a high-value project where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the globe," says the resident. "But they want to eradicate our community and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The cramped lanes of Dharavi sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that loom over the neighborhood. Homes are built haphazardly and frequently missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is permeated by the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

Among some individuals, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a developed area of high-end towers, neat parks, modern retail complexes and apartments with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream come true.

"There's no proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for kids to enjoy," explains a tea vendor, 56, who relocated from southern India in the early eighties. "The single option is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

However, some, like the leather artisan, are fighting against the redevelopment.

None deny that Dharavi, historically ignored as informal housing, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they worry that this project – absent of public consultation – could potentially transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, evicting the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have resided there since generations ago.

This involved these marginalized, displaced people who built up the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and commercial output, whose economic value is valued at between a significant amount and a substantial sum a year, making it a major informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately 1 million residents living in the crowded 2.2 square kilometer zone, fewer than half will be able for replacement housing in the project, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to complete. The remainder will be moved to barren areas and saline fields on the far outskirts of Mumbai, potentially fragment a generations-old community. Some will not get homes at all.

Those allowed to continue living in the neighborhood will be given apartments in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the organic, collective approach of dwelling and laboring that has sustained this area for many years.

Businesses from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are projected to shrink in number and be transferred to a specific "industrial sector" far from homes.

Existential Threat

For residents like the leather artisan, a workshop owner and long-time resident to live in Dharavi, the project presents a survival challenge. His rickety, multi-level workshop creates leather coats – formal jackets, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – marketed in high-end shops in south Mumbai and internationally.

Relatives dwells in the spaces underneath and laborers and garment workers – laborers from north India – also sleep in the same building, allowing him to sustain operations. Away from Dharavi's enclave, Mumbai rents are often tenfold as high for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

At the administrative buildings in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan shows an alternative perspective. Fashionable people mill about on bicycles and e-vehicles, purchasing western-style baguettes and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area adjacent to a coffee shop and treat station. This depicts a stark contrast from the 20-rupee idli sambar morning meal and budget beverage that sustains the neighborhood.

"This represents no progress for us," explains the artisan. "It's a huge real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the business conglomerate. Run by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the government head – the corporation has encountered allegations of favoritism and questionable practices, which it denies.

Although administrative bodies calls it a collaborative effort, the business group invested a significant amount for its controlling interest. A case alleging that the initiative was improperly granted to the developer is under review in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to actively protest the development, protesters and community members assert they have been experienced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – including phone calls, explicit warnings and insinuations that speaking against the project was equivalent to speaking against the country – by figures they claim represent the corporate group.

Part of the group accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c