🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.